The valuation argument. What changes when IP lives in the system.
Buyers pay for what they can keep. When the IP is in the firm and not the partner, the earn out shrinks and the cash at close grows.
Services firms sell at 0.7 to 1.2 times revenue. Software firms sell at 4 to 8 times revenue. The difference is not the work. The difference is what the buyer can keep when the founders leave.
What the buyer is actually paying for.
Every M&A buyer asks the same questions in the first call. What is your IP. Where does it live. What happens if your senior partners leave. How much of the revenue is one client. How much of the delivery is one person.
The honest answer for most services firms is uncomfortable. The IP lives in heads. The seniors are the firm. The revenue is concentrated. The buyer hears that and writes the deal accordingly.
Earn out grows. Cash at close shrinks. The founder spends three years working for the buyer at the buyer's pace, hoping the people stay long enough to qualify for the earn out.
What changes when IP lives in the system.
Same revenue. Same EBITDA. Different conversation.
The IP is in the platform. Versioned. Auditable. Transferrable. The senior partners can leave and the method does not. The buyer is buying a firm, not three people with a folder of decks.
Diligence runs differently. The buyer reviews the encoded playbooks. The agent logs. The engagement templates. The auditable client outputs. The seniors are still important. But they are not the entire asset.
The multiple lift.
Services firms that have systematised delivery see multiples lift from 0.8 times revenue to 1.5 to 2.5 times revenue. Not because the EBITDA changed. Because the durability of that EBITDA changed.
For a firm doing USD 8M in revenue at 20 percent EBITDA, that lift is the difference between an USD 6.4M sale and a USD 16M sale. On the same firm. Same year.
The encoding cost is dramatically less than the difference.
The earn out question.
Even firms that do not get the multiple lift see the earn out shrink and the cash at close grow.
Earn outs exist because the buyer is hedging against the founder leaving. The earn out forces the founder to stay long enough for the firm to be transferrable. Encoded IP shortens that horizon dramatically. Sometimes it eliminates the earn out altogether.
Cash at close goes up. Time locked in goes down. Both matter.
What founders miss.
Most founders think about valuation in the year they decide to sell. By then it is too late to encode the IP properly. Diligence catches firms that started encoding three months ago. It rewards firms that started three years ago.
The valuation argument is the strongest argument for systematising early. Not because you are planning to sell. Because the day you decide to, the work is done.
Even firms that never sell get the same benefit. The firm becomes durable. The founder gets to take a holiday. The next generation of partners has something to inherit.
ConsultancyOS is the system underneath that. Apply for the founding cohort.
Get the next note when it ships.
One short piece every two weeks. Consulting operating model, the agent layer, margin discipline. Operator length. No tracking pixels. Unsubscribe in one click.
See if your firm fits the wave.
ConsultancyOS opens public availability after Wave 3. Founding cohort firms get founder led onboarding and pricing locked for life. Apply and we will tell you which wave you fit.